I am talking about the implications of creating humans unethically in ways that would upend society as we know it.
Denying our strong familial bounds due to pregnancy and raising our biological offspring is silly. I am not saying fatherhood isn’t real or that people can’t adopt.
Did I say adoption didn’t happen. No.
How does cesarian section have anything to do with artificial wombs!? It doesn’t.
Is a surrogate anything like a test tube baby that no longer requires a human to give up their bodily autonomy to make. No.
Would be being born from a test tube in our current society be traumatic. Most likely.
Who will be able to have test tube babies. Not the poor!
What if someone decides to make a clone of themselves to harvest organs. Likely scenario.
What if someone gets your genetic material and makes a baby without your permission. Ethical issues abound.
How many human lives will be lost trying to perfect this technology. Countless.
Why doesn’t this idea give you the ick? You are incredibly naive.
Your mother gives birth to you. She doesn’t just donate genetic material. She carries you inside her for 9 months before pushing you out and holding you as you take your first breathe. This is the way it has been for millions of years.
What people are proposing is breaking that human cycle. Eliminating the investment of time body and soul into the next generation. Pretending this wouldn’t have significant impacts on our society is farcical. Population could literally be controlled by whoever has the money.
We would also likely end up in a Gattaca situation because who would want to spend the money on a defective baby. Crispr babies raised by the government or corporations doesn’t sound like a future I would look forward to.
What did I say!? Go troll someone else and stop acting like a dumbass.
Woah there now partner, personally accountability is only for drug addicts, homeless, and liberal women.
Sorry to break reality to you and him.
Also, we are talking about an artificial womb so you wouldn’t have a mother.
Pedo-a-Loto
Ah yes, break the bonds that bind family and ultimately society together to “protect women”. It is only lethal in places with shitty medical car…okay I see where you are going with this.
Cool, now we can make orphans with technology!
Two so far!
We can do better than that MAHA.
If it would just lead to a world of less developmentally delayed people that would be a good thing, but the reality is we are going to end up with Gattaca.
Always was, always will.
Streisand effect!
So they are going to stop… right!?
I remember steam when it came out. It was absolute garbage and I was like what is up with Valve trying to force me to use their stupid online platform.
Half life was fire though.
You are so fucking wrong it isn’t funny. Please tell me your made up definition as you act like an ecotardburger.
I am glad you clarified that. Thank you. At first it felt like you were saying that inversion layers don’t hold pollution.
Obviously inversion exists without humans, but if humans are present it will trap their pollution locally until it goes away.
Yeah, you definitely don’t know what that word means.
Also, try telling the civilization of Easter Island overpopulation isn’t a problem. Did you know the Middle East used to be a forest?
No ecofascists here, but I am starting to suspect someone is an ecotard.
What family would get to use a robotic womb!? This type of technology would be reserved for the wealthy. The wealthy would likely create a genetically altered human baby to be super smart and resistant to disease.
How many humans are you comfortable killing to develop this technology? How many more humans get to suffer being created as orphans without a real family.
What I think is irrelevant. What the market will demand when we can create human life with the flip of a swotch will be another thing. Creating super soldiers, organ donors, human lab experiments, creating a slave caste, etc. will definitely be on the table.
If you haven’t thought of these implications that is on you boo.